Here is an excerpt from the article:
Each year, federal inspectors find illegal levels of antibiotics in hundreds of older dairy cows bound for the slaughterhouse. Concerned that those antibiotics might also be contaminating the milk Americans drink, the Food and Drug Administration intended to begin tests this month on the milk from farms that had repeatedly sold cows tainted by drug residue.
But the testing plan met with fierce protest from the dairy industry, which said that it could force farmers to needlessly dump millions of gallons of milk while they waited for test results. Industry officials and state regulators said the testing program was poorly conceived and could lead to costly recalls that could be avoided with a better plan for testing.
Now here is a quote from the Vice President of the Dairy Farmers od America:
“What has been served up, up to this point, by Food and Drug has been potentially very damaging to innocent dairy farmers,” said John J. Wilson, a senior vice president for Dairy Farmers of America, the nation’s largest dairy cooperative. He said that that the nation’s milk was safe and that there was little reason to think that the slaughterhouse findings would be replicated in tests of the milk supply.
My question is, why shouldn’t the FDA, who had reason to believe that there is a milk supply tainted with antibiotics because of the test returned from MILK COWS SENT TO THE SLAUGHTERHOUSE. have access to the dairy farms to test the milk and the cattle for overdosing (or, IMHO just plain old “dosing”) of antibiotics?
BTW,
I don’t follow these dairy farm practices. No antibiotics here.
Why not read the article and decide for yourselves?
F.D.A and Dairy Industry Spar Over Testing of Milk – NYTimes.com.